Reason #542 to not let lawyers handle your PR…
Posted by: Mike Geraci | 29 July 2008 | 12:08 pm
In a recent story in Snews on Life is Good taking heat for the way they handled ending relationships with retailers who also carry the Life is Crap brand, the following gem jumped from the page:
“I totally used John Banse’s (editor’s note: Banse is the legal counsel for Life is Good) list of comments… I didn’t really get to say much…” The email further stated, “I just tried to stay to the J Banse script, talked politely, and just restated our policy, offering that I hoped she’d see the importance of spreading optimism rather than negativity….”
A lawyer’s communication style and language is best suited for the court of law. It is direct, cold and there is lots of it so as to leave absolutely no mistake as to the intent of the communication. PR peep’s style and language is better suited for the court of public opinion. We use things like adjectives to help convey feeling and emotions.
Have you ever had a warm glowing feeling after reading a letter from a lawyer? Do you want your customers to feel that way? Let the PR peeps translate the legalese into a more palatable form so your customers will feel good and not crappy.




July 30th, 2008 at 8:51 am
[…] their Life is Good accounts if they continued to carry the cynical knockoff called Life is Crap. Geraci at Base Camp Communications uses it as an opportunity to point out why you don’t want lawyers to handle your press […]
September 24th, 2008 at 4:37 pm
I couldn’t agree more!! And I like how you put it into the customer context.
I always heard that they’re called “legal counsel” for a reason, they give advice, they don’t make executive decisions.
Thanks for the insightful post.